An Experiment
in Digital Democracy: Will it Work?
How
strong is our democracy? And does the
digital age have the potential to strengthen it?
That’s
what the citizens of Mexico City are about to find out, in a fascinating
experiment in digital democracy. Just
six months ago Mexico City was granted the right to become its own master and
now is taking steps to craft its first-ever Constitution. Mexico City mayor
Miguel Angel Mancera, seizing this rare opportunity, opened the digital gates,
asking citizens to submit petitions to help shape this historic document.
The
idea, according to mayor Mancera, as reported in qz.com, “is to bestow the
constitution project with a democratic, progressive, inclusive, civic and
plural character.”
As
an experiment in digital democracy, Mexico City – a metropolitan area home to
more than 20 million people – is on the cutting edge. Iceland, a country of
330,000 people, launched a similar experiment some years ago, and similar
efforts have been tried around the globe. But nothing approaches the scale and
significance of Mexico City.
Will
it work?
By late June, more than 206,000 citizens have raised their voice, submitting a
total of 330 petitions. The biggest issues?
Corruption, jobs, access to technology, women’s rights, animal rights
and protecting the environment (e.g., taking steps to become a Smart
City). And the mayor is serious: he’s
set up more than 300 kiosks around the city for citizens input, guaranteed
petitioners the right to meet with his 27-member committee if they garner
sufficient support and used results from a detailed “Imagine Your City” survey
to guide the crafters. Further, through
pubpub.com (an editing platform similar to Google Docs and created by MIT’s
Media Lab), citizens can comment directly on Constitution proposals.
There
are skeptics, of course. Digital rights lawyer Antonio Martinez told qz.com:
“It’s a bit of a show,” given that the committee is under no legal obligation
to incorporate citizen input. But others insist that the process, however
flawed, will enhance accountability.
Said Diego Cuesy, a city policy analyst, in the qz.com article: “The
platform represents, at the very least, a commitment by the government to
listen [and] there will also be an electronic record for everyone to see.”
What’s
the process? If a petition garners more than 5,000 supporters, the mayor’s
committee will respond. More than 10,000?
Committee members will meet with petitioners. More than 50,000? Petitioners will address the full committee
(by late June, a dozen petitions have passed the 10K mark, with one
approaching 50,000, see sidebar, below). Among the 330 petitions in play,
said a fusion.net report, are recommendations to: lower the voting age to 16,
ban zoos, reduce wages for government officials, increase paid vacation days,
extend maternity and paternity leave and ban the sale of junk food in schools. Plus,
this notable proposal: requiring Mexico City cops to wear GoPro-style cameras
to prevent corruption and abuse of power.
Noted
the fusion.net report: “[It’s a] “daunting challenge [to write] a magna carta
for a city that has existed for nearly 700 years.” Yet, optimism is high. Said
one-time skeptic Francisco Fontano, a young Mexican travel blogger, as quoted
at fusion.net: “If this process turns out to be fake and it all fails, it won’t
matter because I did what I could . . . I’ve always believed you have to remain
idealistic to change things; be a little crazy and always stay positive.”
Good
words to live by.
##
Sidebar
Digital
Democracy: Mexico City’s most popular proposal
Over
200,000 citizens of Mexico City have weighed in, submitting over 330 petitions
aimed at shaping the city’s first-ever Constitution, and the most popular
proposal to date (48,997 supporters and counting) deals with corruption. The
petition reads, in part: “We are tired of seeing every day how public servants
in senior positions [receive] high wages and benefits . . . often without
meeting a minimally acceptable performance. It is necessary that the new
Constitution of the CDMX establishes the right of citizens to good governance,
so as to limit and regulate . . . bonuses, benefits, rewards, incentives,
bonuses, vouchers, travel expenses, compensation, insurance payments tax or
subsidy. . . . In addition, the right to good administration should include a
general principle of austerity in public spending.”
No comments:
Post a Comment